What does the name Mitrofan mean. Description, image and characteristics of Mitrofan in the comedy "Undergrowth": useful information for writing

home / Cheating husband

Hearing the name of the comedy "Undergrowth", the image of an idler and an ignoramus emerges. Not always the word undergrowth had an ironic meaning. During the time of Peter the Great, children of the nobility under the age of 15 were called undergrowths. Fonvizin managed to give the word a different meaning. After the release of the comedy, it became a household name. The image and characterization of Mitrofanushka in the comedy "Undergrowth" are negative. Through this character, Fonvizin wanted to show the degradation of the Russian nobility, when a person ceases to be a person, turning into an ignorant and stupid beast.



The key role in the comedy "Undergrowth" is occupied by Mitrofan Prostakov, a noble son. The name Mitrofan means "similar", similar to his mother. Parents, as in the water looked. By naming the child by this name, they received a complete copy of themselves. An idler and a parasite, accustomed to the fact that all desires are fulfilled the first time. Favorite activities are good food and sleep. Mitrofan is only 16 years old, and when his peers are full of aspirations and desires, they are completely absent from him.

Mitrofan and mother

Mitrofan is a typical sissy.

“Well, Mitrofanushka, I see you are a mother’s son, and not a father!”

The father loves his son no less than the mother, but the father's opinion means nothing to him. Seeing how the mother treats her husband, humiliating the serfs in front of her, either with a word or with a cuff, the guy made certain conclusions. If a man voluntarily allowed himself to be turned into a rag, then what he deserves. The only desire to wipe your feet and step over.

Thanks to his mother, Mitrofan is absolutely not adapted to life. Why fill your head with problems and worries when there are servants and a mother who is ready for anything for him. Her guardianship and doggy adoration irritated me. Maternal love did not find a response in his heart. He grew up cold, unfeeling. In the final scene, Mitrofan proved that his mother was indifferent to him. He refuses a loved one, as soon as he hears that she has lost everything. Rushing to him in the hope of getting support, the woman hears a rude:

"Yes, get rid of you, mother, how imposed"

Self-interest, the desire to get rich quickly and effortlessly became his credo. These traits are also passed down from the mother. Even the wedding with Sophia was at the suggestion of the mother, who wanted to profitably attach her unlucky son.

“I don’t want to study, I want to get married”

These are Mitrofan's words addressed to her. The proposal was accepted by them with a bang. After all, a wedding with a rich heiress promised him a carefree and secure future.

Leisure

Favorite leisure food and sleep. Food for Mitrofan meant a lot. The guy loved to eat. He stuffed his belly so that he could not sleep. He was constantly tormented by colic, but this did not make the amount of food eaten less.

“Yes, it’s clear, brother, you dined tightly ...”

Having dined heavily, Mitrofan usually went to the dovecote or went to bed. If not for the teachers with their classes, he would get out of bed only to look into the kitchen.

Attitude towards learning

Science was given to Mitrofan with difficulty. For four years the teachers fought to teach the stupid guy at least something, but the result was zero. The mother herself, an uneducated woman, inspired her son that it was not necessary to study. The main thing is money and power, everything else is a waste of time.

“Only you suffer, and everything, I see, is emptiness. Don't study this stupid science!"

Peter's decree that noble children should know arithmetic, God's word and grammar played a role. She had to hire teachers not out of love for the sciences, but because it was supposed to be. It is not surprising that with such an attitude towards learning, Mitrofan did not understand and did not know elementary things.

The value of Mitrofan in comedy

Through the image of Mitrofan, Fonvizin wanted to show what can happen to a person if he stops developing, getting stuck in one pore and forgetting about human values ​​such as love, kindness, honesty, respect for people.

The eighteenth century gave Russian (and world, of course) literature many outstanding names and talented figures. One of them is Denis Ivanovich Fonvizin, writer and playwright. Most of the inhabitants, he is known as the author of the comedy "Undergrowth". How was the most famous work of the author created, from whom did he write his characters and what is special about one of the heroes of the play - Mitrofanushka?

Denis Fonvizin

Before talking about the comedy itself, it is necessary to say at least briefly about its author. Denis Fonvizin lived a not too long (only forty-seven years), but a bright life. Most know him only as the person who wrote The Undergrowth, meanwhile, he wrote the play The Brigadier, many translations and adaptations, treatises and essays.

Despite the fact that he wrote only two plays (and even after “The Brigadier” he did not turn to dramaturgy for more than ten years), it is Fonvizin who is the “progenitor” of the so-called Russian everyday comedy.

"Undergrowth" Fonvizin: the history of creation

Despite the fact that The Undergrowth was completed by the writer and politician in the early eighties, there is reason to believe that Fonvizin conceived his satirical "comedy of manners" back in the sixties: it is to this time that the play belongs, which first saw the light of day only in the past century - during the life of the author, it was never published. Her characters can be called the early prototypes of the heroes of "Undergrowth": familiar features are quite easily captured in each of them.

While working on comedy, Denis Ivanovich used a huge variety of sources - both articles and works of various authors (both modern and past centuries), and even texts written by Catherine the Great herself. Having finished work on The Undergrowth, Fonvizin, of course, decided to stage the play, although he understood that it would be difficult to do this - an abundance of new ideas and bold statements blocked the work from reaching a wide audience. Nevertheless, he himself undertook the preparation of the performance and, albeit slowly, albeit with all sorts of delays, The Undergrowth saw the light of day in the theater on Tsaritsyn Meadow and received phenomenal success with the audience. This happened in 1782, and a year later the play was first published.

Who is this imbecile

Many are sincerely perplexed by the title of the work. In fact, why - undergrowth? What is this word anyway? Everything is simple. In the eighteenth century (and it was then that Denis Fonvizin lived and worked), a young man of noble (that is, noble) origin who had not received an education was called a “undergrowth”. A person is lazy, stupid, incapable of anything - that's who such an undergrowth is. Such young men could not get a job, and they were not given permission to marry.

Denis Ivanovich called his work "Undergrowth" because that is exactly what Mitrofanushka is, one of the main characters. He put a little more satire into this word than it had in reality. The undergrowth, with the light hand of Fonvizin, is not only uneducated, but also a selfish and rude young man. The characterization of the image of Mitrofanushka will be presented in more detail later.

The plot of "Undergrowth" revolves around the modest girl Sophia, left without parents and therefore taken up by the Prostakov family, greedy and narrow-minded people. Sophia is a rich heiress, a marriageable bride, and the Prostakovs want to get a wife with such a dowry, trying to pass her off as their sixteen-year-old son Mitrofanushka, who is undersized, and Prostakova's brother Skotinin, obsessed with the idea of ​​​​a large number of cattle in Sofya's farm. Sophia also has a loved one - Milon, for whom she wants to give her and her only relative - Uncle Starodum. He comes to the Prostakovs and is very surprised to see how the owners curry favor with him and his niece. They try to put Mitrofanushka in the best light, but the uneducated and lazy bumpkin spoils all the attempts of the mother.

Having learned that Starodum and Milon are taking Sophia away, at night, on the orders of the Prostakovs, they try to steal her, but Milon prevents the abduction. It all ends with the fact that the Prostakovs lose not only a profitable bride, but also their estates - their greed, anger and self-interest are to blame.

Main characters

The main characters of "Undergrowth" are the already mentioned Mitrofanushka, his parents (it should be noted that everything in this family is run by the mother, who does not consider servants to be people, strongly following the fashion of that time; the father of the family is completely under the heel of his imperious wife, who even raises her hand against him), Sofya, her uncle Starodum, the fiance Milon, the state official Pravdin, whose goal is to expose the atrocities of the Prostakovs (he eventually succeeds in this). It is necessary to pay special attention to the fact that Fonvizin used “talking” names for his characters - they are endowed with both positive (Starodum, Pravdin, Sofya) and negative (Skotinin, Prostakov) characters. In the characterization of Mitrofanushka, his name is also of great importance - from the Greek "Mitrofan" means "sissy", which really fully reflects the character of the hero. Only at the very end of the play Mitrofanushka quarrels with her mother and tells her to leave him alone.

Fonvizin pushes foreheads in his work on completely different social strata - officials, nobles, and servants are represented here ... He openly ridicules the nobles with their upbringing, condemns people like the Prostakovs. From the very first words of the play it is easy to understand where are the positive and where are the negative characters and what is the attitude of the author to each of them. In many ways, it is thanks to the beautifully written images of negative characters (especially the characterization of Mitrofanushka) that the “comedy of manners” brought such success to its creator. The name of Mitrofanushka has generally become a household name. The play, in addition, was disassembled into popular expressions with quotes.

Characteristics of Mitrofanushka should be given special attention. However, first it is necessary to say about three more characters in the play. These are Mitrofanushka's teachers - Tsyfirkin, Kuteikin and Vralman. They cannot be directly attributed either to the positive, or to they belong to a type of people in which both good and bad are equally combined. However, their surnames are also “speaking”: they talk about the main property of a person - for example, Vralman’s is a lie, and Tsyfirkin’s is a love of mathematics.

"Undergrowth": characteristics of Mitrofanushka

The character, in whose "honor" the work is named, is almost sixteen years old. While many of his age are completely independent adults, Mitrofanushka cannot take a single step without her mother's prompting, without holding on to her skirt. He is one of those who are called "sissy" (and as mentioned above, a direct indication of this is contained even in the meaning of his name). Despite the fact that Mitrofanushka has a father, the boy does not receive a male upbringing in the full sense of the word - his father himself is not famous for such properties.

For parents, Mitrofanushka is still a small child - even in his presence they talk about him in this way, calling him a child, a child - and Mitrofanushka shamelessly uses this throughout the comedy. The boy does not put his father in a penny, thus proving once again that he is a perfect "sissy". Very indicative in this regard is the scene where Mitrofan pities his mother, who is tired of beating her father - so she, poor, worked hard, beating him. There is no question of sympathizing with the father.

It is not entirely possible to give a brief description of Mitrofanushka in "Undergrowth" - there is so much that can be said about this character. For example, he really likes to eat tightly, and then - to soak up the pleasure of doing nothing (however, he doesn’t really have anything to do, except for studies, in which, to be honest, he is not diligent at all). Like his mother, Mitrofan is a rather heartless person. He likes to humiliate others, putting them below himself, once again "pointing the place" to the people working for him. So, he constantly offends his nanny, assigned to him from birth, who is always on his side. This is another significant moment in the characterization of Mitrofanushka from the comedy "Undergrowth".

Mitrofanushka is a sneak and insolent, but meanwhile he is a toady: already at that age he feels who should not be rude, in front of whom it is worth "showing his best qualities." The only trouble is that with such a mother's upbringing, Mitrofanushka simply cannot have the best qualities. Even to her, the one who so blindly loves him and allows him everything, he threatens, blackmails her in an attempt to achieve what he wants for himself. Such qualities do not honor the characterization of Mitrofanushka, speaking of him as a bad person, ready to go over heads for the sake of himself and his demands, as a person who loves only as long as his will is fulfilled.

Interestingly, Mitrofan is characterized by self-criticism: he is aware that he is lazy and stupid. However, he is not at all upset about this, declaring that "he is not a hunter for smart girls." It is unlikely that such a quality passed to him from his mother, rather he adopted it from his father - at least he had to inherit something from him. This is a brief description of Mitrofanushka, a hero whose name for several centuries has been called people with similar character traits.

Was it a boy?

It is known that Fonvizin "peeped" scenes for his work in life. But what about the heroes? Are they completely invented or written off from real-life people?

The characterization of the hero Mitrofanushka gives reason to believe that Alexei Olenin was his prototype. Subsequently, he became known as a statesman and historian, as well as an artist. But until the age of eighteen, his behavior was absolutely similar to the characteristics of Mitrofanushka: he did not want to study, he was rude, lazy, as they say, wasting his life in vain. It is believed that it was Fonvizin’s comedy that helped Alexei Olenin “get on the right path”: allegedly, after reading it, he recognized himself in the main character, saw his portrait from the side for the first time and was so shocked that he gained motivation for “rebirth”.

Like it or not, now it is impossible to know for sure. But some facts from Olenin's biography have been preserved. So, until the age of ten, he was raised by his father and a specially hired tutor, he also studied at home. When he went to school (and not to any, but to the Court of Pages), he was soon sent to continue his studies abroad - he was chosen for this purpose, since little Alyosha showed excellent success in learning. Abroad, he graduated from two higher institutions - thus, it is not necessary to say that Olenin was lazy and ignorant, like Mitrofanushka. It is quite possible that some of the qualities inherent in Olenin resembled the characteristics of Mitrofanushka, however, most likely, it is impossible to assert that Olenin is a 100% prototype of Fonvizin's hero. More likely, however, that Mitrofan is a kind of collective image.

The meaning of the comedy "Undergrowth" in literature

"Undergrowth" has been studied for more than two centuries - from the very release of the play to this day. It is difficult to overestimate its significance: it satirically ridicules the social and even state structure of society. And he does it openly, not even afraid of the authorities - and meanwhile, Catherine the Great, precisely because of this, after the publication of The Undergrowth, forbade the publication of anything that came out from the pen of Fonvizin.

His comedy highlights the thorny issues of the time, but they remain no less relevant today. The shortcomings of society that existed in the eighteenth century have not gone away in the twenty-first. The play, with the light hand of Pushkin, was called a "folk comedy" - it has every right to be called that today.

  1. In the first version of the play, Mitrofanushka is called Ivanushka.
  2. The initial version of the comedy is closer to the play "The Brigadier".
  3. Fonvizin worked on The Undergrowth for about three years.
  4. He drew ideas for writing from life, but spoke about the creation of only one scene - the one where Eremeevna protects her pupil from Skotinin.
  5. When Nikolai Vasilyevich Gogol studied at the gymnasium, he played the role of Mrs. Prostakova in school productions.
  6. Fonvizin sketched out the continuation of "Undergrowth" in letters to Sophia and Starodum to each other: according to the author's idea, after the wedding, Milon cheated on Sophia, which she complained to her uncle about.
  7. For the first time, the idea of ​​creating such a work originated with Denis Ivanovich when he was in France.

More than two centuries have passed since the creation of the play, and it does not lose its relevance to this day. More and more research is devoted to the study of comedy itself and its individual characters. This means that Denis Fonvizin managed to notice and highlight in his work something that will attract the attention of readers and viewers at all times.

MITROFANUSHKA

MITROFANUSHKA - the hero of D.I. Fonvizin's comedy "Undergrowth" (1781), a sixteen-year-old teenager (undergrowth), the only son of Mrs. Prostakova, mother's darling and favorite of the servants. M. as a literary type was not the discovery of Fonvizin. Russian literature of the late 18th century. she knew and portrayed such undersized people living freely in rich parental homes and at the age of sixteen barely mastered the letter. Fonvizin endowed this traditional figure of noble life (especially provincial) with the generic features of the Prostakovo-Skotininsky “nest”.

In the house of his parents, M. is the main "amusing person" and "entertainer", an inventor and a witness to all stories like the one that he dreamed of in a dream: how mother beat father. It is a textbook known how M. took pity on his mother, who was busy with the heavy duty of beating her father. M.'s day is marked by absolute idleness: fun in the dovecote, where M. escapes from lessons, is interrupted by Eremeevna, who begs the "child" to learn. Having blabbed to his uncle about his desire to marry, M. immediately hides behind Eremeevna - "an old bastard", in his words - ready to lay down his life, but "child" "do not give out." M.’s boorish arrogance is akin to his mother’s manner of treating household members and servants: “freak” and “dead” - husband, “dog daughter” and “bad mug” - Eremeevna, “beast” - girl Palashka.

If the intrigue of the comedy revolves around the marriage of M. to Sofya, longed for by the Prostakovs, then the plot is focused on the topic of education and teaching of an underage teenager. This is a traditional topic for educational literature. M.'s teachers were selected in accordance with the norm of the time and the level of understanding of their task by parents. Here, Fonvizin emphasizes the details that speak of the quality of choice, which is characteristic of the simpleton family: M. is taught in French by the German Vralman, the exact sciences are taught by retired sergeant Tsyfirkin, who “marks a little arithmetic”, grammar is taught by the “educated” seminarian Kuteikin, dismissed from "every doctrine" by permission of the consistory. Hence, in the well-known scene of the exam, M. - an outstanding invention of Mitrofan's ingenuity about the noun and adjective door, hence the intriguingly fabulous ideas about the story set out by the cowgirl Khavronya. On the whole, the result was summed up by Mrs. Prostakova, who was convinced that "without science, people live and lived."

The hero of Fonvizin is a teenager, almost a youth, whose character is stricken with a disease of dishonesty that spreads to every thought and every feeling inherent in him. He is unscrupulous in his attitude towards his mother, by whose efforts he exists in comfort and idleness, and whom he abandons at the moment when she needs his consolation. The comic robes of the image are funny only at first glance. V.O. Klyuchevsky attributed M. to the breed of creatures “related to insects and microbes”, characterizing this type with inexorable “reproducibility”.

Thanks to the hero Fonvizin, the word "undergrowth" (previously neutral) became a household name for a loafer, lazybones and lazybones.

Lit .: Vyazemsky P. Fon-Vizin. St. Petersburg, 1848; Klyuchevsky V. "Undergrowth" Fonvizin

//Klyuchevsky V. Historical portraits. M., 1990; Rassadin St. Fonvizin. M., 1980.

E.V. Yusim


literary heroes. - Academician. 2009 .

Synonyms:

See what "MITROFANUSHKA" is in other dictionaries:

    Ignorant, ignorant, undersized, half-educated Dictionary of Russian synonyms. mitrofanushka n., number of synonyms: 5 mitrofan (3) ... Synonym dictionary

    MITROFANUSHKA, and, husband. (colloquial). An overgrown ignoramus [by the name of the hero of Fonvizin's comedy "Undergrowth"]. Explanatory dictionary of Ozhegov. S.I. Ozhegov, N.Yu. Shvedova. 1949 1992 ... Explanatory dictionary of Ozhegov

    The protagonist of the comedy "Undergrowth" (1783) by Denis Ivanovich Fonvizin (1745-1792) is a spoiled landowner's son, a lazy and ignorant one. A common noun for young people of this type. Encyclopedic Dictionary of winged words and expressions. M .: "Lokid ... ... Dictionary of winged words and expressions

    M. 1. Literary character. 2. Used as a symbol of a stupid, undereducated young man from a wealthy family; undergrowth. Explanatory Dictionary of Ephraim. T. F. Efremova. 2000... Modern explanatory dictionary of the Russian language Efremova

    Undergrowth comedy by Denis Ivanovich Fonvizin. This play is his most famous work and the most repertory play of the 18th century on the Russian stage of subsequent centuries. Fonvizin worked on the comedy for about three years. The premiere took place in 1782 ... Wikipedia

    Mitrofanushka- Mitrof anushka, and, genus. n. pl. h. nis (undergrowth) ... Russian spelling dictionary

    Mitrofanushka- (1 m) (lit. character; also about a lazy person and an ignoramus) ... Spelling Dictionary of the Russian Language

    AND; m. and w. Iron. About a poorly educated, lazy, unwilling to study teenager. ● Named after the hero of the comedy Fonvizin Undergrowth (1782) ... encyclopedic Dictionary

    mitrofanushka- and; m. and w.; iron. About a poorly educated, lazy, unwilling to study teenager. After the hero of the comedy Fonvizin Nedorosl (1782) ... Dictionary of many expressions

    Mitrofanushka- the character of the comedy D. Fonvizin Undergrowth (1783), his name has become a household name for a stupid and ignorant young man who does not want to learn ... Russian humanitarian encyclopedic dictionary

Books

  • Undergrowth. Brigadier, Fonvizin Denis Ivanovich. The book includes the most famous works of the playwright, publicist, translator and creator of Russian everyday comedy D. I. Fonvizin. The heroes of the comedy "Undergrowth" are representatives of different social ...

Mitrofan is one of the main characters of the comedy, and the title is dedicated to him. He considers himself already very mature, although still a child, but not cute and naive, but capricious and cruel. Narcissistic, as everyone surrounded him with love, but such - limiting.

Of course he laughs at the teachers. It is clear that he wants to marry the beautiful Sophia already. He is not afraid of anything, but is very cowardly. That is, he is afraid of everything, he is always ready to call his nanny and mommy for help, but he behaves with everyone very arrogantly, defiantly ...

And everything would be fine! But only mommy supports him in everything, does not limit him in any way.

We get acquainted with Mitrofan when he flaunts in a new caftan, and my mother scolds the tailor. Mitrofan has already grown up - a tall, rather dense guy. His face is not very smart, as are his actions. He laughs a little at everyone, plays, fools around. He is definitely well fed, he doesn’t even know the measure, so his stomach often hurts. Physically, he grew up, but his heart and soul were not taken care of. And the fact that his brain simply does not want to remember information (he has been learning the alphabet for three years), this is also Mitrofan's whims. It seems to him that even without science he will have everything - through the efforts of his mother. She almost added him to the rich heiress Sophia, who is also very beautiful and kind.

Mitrofan often does what he is told. Not a teacher, of course, but a mother. She said, they say, kiss the hand of a stranger, so he does. But only for profit. Mitrofanushka has no courtesy, kindness, respect for others.

In general, Mitrofan may not be so bad, but he is very spoiled. The minor believes in his exclusivity "without effort." He sees himself as a successful landowner, sees himself. In his heart there is no love even for his mother who adores him, for his faithful nanny, for anyone. Of course, he loves only himself, but not enough. Otherwise, he would have at least studied, developed!

The image and characteristics of Mitrofanushka with quotes and examples from the text

Mitrofan Prostakov - the hero of the play by D.I. Fonvizin "Undergrowth", a young man, the only son of the noblemen Prostakovs. In the 19th century, young men from noble families were called minors, who, due to their laziness and ignorance, could not complete their studies, and as a result, enter the service and marry.

Fonvizin in his play just makes fun of such young people, embodying their features in the image of one of the main characters of the play - the son of the Prostakovs Mitrofan.

The father and mother love their only son very much and do not notice his shortcomings, moreover, they worry about their son and take care of him as if he were a small child, they protect him from all misfortunes, they are afraid that he might overwork from work: "... while Mitrofanushka still in the undergrowth, sweat him and indulge; and there, after a dozen years, as he enters, God forbid, into the service, he will endure everything ... ".

Mitrofanushka is not averse to having a tasty dinner: "... And I, uncle, almost didn’t have dinner at all [...] Three slices of corned beef, but hearths, I don’t remember, five, I don’t remember ..." "... Yes, you see, brother, you had a hearty supper..." "...Kvass deigned to eat a whole jug...".

Mitrofan is a very rude and cruel young man: he tortures the serfs, mocks his teachers, does not hesitate to raise his hand even against his father. This is the fault of the mother, who took the household into her own hands and does not put her husband in anything. Neither peasants nor relatives like her, because she swears and beats everyone for no reason.

Mrs. Prostakova is also responsible for the upbringing and education of Mitrofanushka, but she does not interfere much in these processes. Therefore, the young man is cruel and rude, but he cannot stand up for himself, but hides behind his mother's skirt. Things with studies are also not better. Not only is Mitrofan stupid and lazy, he is not interested in anything, he is not curious, and he is very bored in the lessons. In addition, his teachers are useless - the former deacon Kuteikin, the retired sergeant Tsyfirkin and the former coachman Vralman are ignorant and poorly educated people: "... Well, what can get out of Mitrofanushka for the fatherland, for which ignorant parents also pay money to ignoramuses - teachers?.." In addition, Vralman is a French teacher, although he himself is German, he does not know French, but manages to teach him to a boy.

The image of Mitrofan reflected the type of a representative of the younger generation of that time: lazy, ignorant, rude; he does not strive to grow spiritually, mentally and culturally, he does not have any ideals and aspirations.

Option 3

Denis Ivanovich Fonvizin is a great Russian writer. In his work “Undergrowth”, he showed readers a generalized image of the younger generation from the nobility of the 19th century, using the example of the protagonist Mitrofan. The name Mitrofan in Greek means "resembling a mother." The hero is brought up in a family in which relationships are built on lies, flattery, and rudeness. The mother raised her son as an unlucky, uneducated person. Mitrofan has no goals and aspirations in life, they are too small and insignificant. He is spoiled, rudely treats not only the servants, but also his parents. Fonvizin did not invent this image. In fact, at that time in the circles of the nobility, there were often undergrowths like Mitrofan, who studied poorly, did nothing, lived their days like that.

Mitrofan had home teachers who, in principle, did not give him any knowledge. But the hero’s desire to study is completely absent. He is stupid, naive, his speech is not developed and rude. This person is not adapted to the surrounding life, he cannot do anything without a mother and without servants. His main activities during the day are eating, relaxing and chasing pigeons. What made Mitrofan exactly like that? Of course, this is the system of education that came from Prostakova, the mother of the hero. She indulged his whims too much, encouraged all his mistakes, and thus, in the end, this was the result of education. It is the blind love of a mother for her child.

Being brought up in such conditions, Mitrofan got used to having the right to vote in the family, to be rude to others. It will be very difficult for a person like Mitrofan in life if he is left alone with his problems. At the end of the work, Prostakova loses her estate and, along with it, loses her own son. This is the fruit of her upbringing. This result of the comedy shows the level of this system of upbringing and education.

On the example of the image of Mitrofan, Fonvizin showed one of the main problems in family education. This problem is still relevant today. In modern society, there are also such spoiled children who grow up in such conditions. Everyone should think about how to eradicate such undergrowths that are dragging our society back. I think that people like Mitrofan do not know what real life is and do not understand what its meaning is because of their ignorance. I feel sorry for these children and their parents. I hope that all parents, after reading this comedy, will understand their mistakes and be able to raise a worthy citizen of their country.

Essay 4

The play "Undergrowth" was written by Fonvizin in 1781. A year later, she was put on stage. The performance made a splash. But the work caused dissatisfaction with Catherine II and Denis Ivanovich was forbidden to publish his works, and the theater on the stage of which the premiere took place was closed.

In the eighteenth century, underage children were called noble children who had not reached the age of sixteen. It was believed that they had not yet "grown up" to an independent, adult life.

One of the main characters of the comedy, Mitrofanushka, was such an undergrowth. In our time, this name has become a household name, a synonym for a stupid and lazy sissy.

Mitrofan is almost 16 years old. And it's time for him to serve in the army. But mother, Mrs. Prostakova, blindly loves her son and is not ready to let him go from her for anything in the world. She pampers, indulges him in everything. Indulges him in idleness. Such an upbringing led to the fact that the boy grew up and turned into a rude, lazy ignorant teenager.

They hired teachers for Mitrofanushka, but they didn’t teach him anything, because he didn’t want to study: “I don’t want to study - I want to get married.” However, the mother does not insist on classes: “Go and frolic, Mitrofanushka.” However, such teachers are unlikely to teach the child the mind. turned out to be a coachman.

The son of the Prostakovs does not love or respect anyone. He treats his father with disdain. This is very clearly shown in the scene where the sissy feels sorry for the parent because she ".... was so tired beating the father." Mitrofan is rude to the servants and snaps. He calls his nanny or mother "the old bastard". He mocks teachers and serfs. Our hero and his own mother do not put in anything. No worries touch his heart. He shamelessly uses the blind love of Prostakova. And he even blackmails her: "It's close to the river here. I'll dive, and remember your name." And to the question of what was bad in a dream at night, he answers: "Yes, then you, mother, then father."

To all the listed bad qualities of Mitrofan, one can add cowardice and servility in front of a strong opponent. He humbly asks for mercy when an attempt to forcibly take Sophia down the aisle fails, and on the orders of the Starodum humbly agrees to go to serve.

Thus, in Mitrafanushka, Fonvizin embodied all the shortcomings and vices inherent in the nobility of that time. This is ignorance and stupidity, greed and laziness. At the same time, the manners of a tyrant and servility. This image is not invented by the author, but taken from life. History knows many examples of undersized, illiterate, soulless, using their power, leading an idle lifestyle.

Some interesting essays

  • The life of modern youth - an essay for grade 9

    Life orientations change with each young generation. Remains unchanged - this is a condemnation of the older generation and their life guidelines. Condemnations and teachings of parents and grandparents.

  • Analysis of Gorky's tale Morning

    The main idea in a fairy tale is usually not written right away. It's a fairy tale, a slow, thought-provoking story. Therefore, the beginning of M. Gorky in the fairy tale "Morning" confuses, but the content sets us up.

  • Composition based on the painting by Leonardo Da Vinci Mona Lisa (La Gioconda) description (description)

    Before me is a painting by a world-famous Italian artist. Probably, there is not a single person who has never heard or seen a reproduction of the Mona Lisa or the Mona Lisa.

  • Primitive people, like animals, were afraid of fire. But the process of evolution led to the fact that they understood: it’s good to warm yourself by the fire and the meat baked on it is tastier.

© 2022 skudelnica.ru -- Love, betrayal, psychology, divorce, feelings, quarrels